This is the place where you can personalize your profile!
But, how?
By moving, adding and personalizing widgets.
You can drag and drop to rearrange.
You can edit widgets to customize them.
The bottom has widgets you can add!
Some widgets you can only access when you get a premium membership.
Some widgets have options that are only available when you get a premium membership.
We've split the page into zones!
Certain widgets can only be added to certain zones.
"Why," you ask? Because we want profile pages to have freedom of customization, but also to have some consistency. This way, when anyone visits a deviant, they know they can always find the art in the top left, and personal info in the top right.
Don't forget, restraints can bring out the creativity in you!
Now go forth and astound us all with your devious profiles!
Yeah, so I just noticed that it has been exactly one year to the day (August 25) since I uploaded any deviations. That's kind of a scary thought...and I have no legitimate excuses. Oops.
I've suspected for a while that at least some of the "osteoderms" of Agustinia looked more like dorsal ribs, so I'm glad to see that is supported here (although it makes it a lot less interesting).
As for Megalodon, it depends on what you think a "genus" should be (as it is completely arbitrary). At least two recent studies ([link] and [link]) both suggest that the white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) is more closely related to mako sharks (which are in the genus Isurus) than to the megatooth sharks (C. megalodon). If true, then the only way you could justify putting Megalodon in Carchardon (and keeping it monophyletic) would be by putting the makos into Carcharodon as well. So far, it looks like Megalodon is closer to Otodus. So I'd favor putting it in it's own genus Carcharocles.
Well, that's really odd. I'm guessing it's a glitch. I know I've read somewhere that someone had a similar problem where they would watch someone, but then not get any message info back. Maybe it's related? It's weird, though.
So thanks for the watch! I'll try to keep it coming, although I have been vastly unproductive lately.
Hey! Thanks for the link. A very interesting debate and both sides make excellent points. Makes me even more uncertain about which side is right. I look forward to when some of the new research that both Jack Horner and Nick Longrich refer to is published. A very exciting debate!