First, the Lizards:
Iguana iguana

Dracaena guianensis

Varanus salvator

Varanus salvadorii

Cyclura cornuta
Next, the Theropods:

Daspletosaurus sp.

Velociraptor sp.

Tyrannosaurus rex - "Samson"

Tyrannosaurus sp. "Jane"

The birds:

Cathartes aura

Tachyeres brachypterus

Eudromia elegans

Procellaria aequinoctialis

Phalacrocorax sulcirostris

Rhyncheros jubatus

Chunga burmeisteri

Milvago chimachima

Tympanuchus phasianellus

Mergus merganser
Crocodylians:

Crocodylus niloticus

Alligator mississippiensis
Discussion:
Now that we've seen some skulls of various animals, it is interesting to note that birds and crocodylians both have small foramina close to the edge of the lower part of their maxillae. Yet neither of these groups have lips, but either have beaks or just tight, scaled skin.
So which is the better model for theropod dinosaurs? At this point, we can't be sure. But it is of note that the most closely related living taxa to dinosaurs (i.e., birds, crocs, etc.) don't have lips. Also, I'd say that the croc and bird mouth foramina look more similar in size, shape, and distribution to those of theropods than do the foramina of lizards. Albeit, the sample I have above is biased...I can't put every skull picture I find of each lizard, theropod, croc, and bird taxon. That said, I say the theropod mouth foramina distribution, size and number fall into the croc-bird range, not the lizard range.
Another interesting thing, is that the the presence of foramina lining the bones of the mouth does not appear to correlate with the presence or absence of lips. In fact, if you look at the skull of mammals, most of which have lips, you'll notice a conspicuous absence of foramina compared to lizards, dinosaurs, crocs and birds:

This chimpanzee skull, for instance, only has a few, large foramina. Most of which aren't in the area of the lips. Yet chimpanzees have very large lips, and are used quite expressively.
So what does this mean for theropods, and by extension, other dinosaurs? Well, to me it indicates that the preponderance of evidence indicates that they did not have lizard-like or mammal-like lips. To me, they probably had tight, possibly keratinous, skin around the edges of the mouth.
But what about the argument that lips would help protect the teeth from damage, rot, infection and dust and sand and other debris? Well, frankly, crocs get along fine without lips. Also remember, that theropods lost teeth on a regular basis and had new teeth behind each tooth ready to take the place should the current tooth fall out. In fact, theropod teeth are extremely common in the fossil record which would seem to indicate that they did lose them rather frequently--rather like sharks. The fact that many early birds had teeth, and did not have lips, would tend to also favor a lip-less hypothesis for theropods.
There is also another anatomical reason why some theropods probably could not have had lips: their teeth were simply too long!

The teeth in this Gorgosaurus go well past the line of foramina. This would mean the teeth would go past the lips, piercing right through them like the dinosaurian version of a babirusa!

Babyrousa sp.
In fact, the babirusa's teeth don't actually pierce through their lips, but [edit:]
So basically, unless we find a theropod fossil mummy with the soft-tissues of the head exquisitely preserved, there is no reason to think theropods had lips. In fact, there is plenty of circumstantial evidence to indicate the opposite: theropods had no lizard lips! The extant-phylogenetic bracketing (EPB) method indicates no lips for theropods. Also, it does not appear that foramina are correlated with the presence of lips (see crocs and birds). Finally, lips are anatomically implausible for many theropods based on their jaw mechanics.
Finally, I apologize that I haven't referenced the scientific literature much on this. The fact is their are only two papers that deal with this subject that I know of, one by Lawrence Witmer and one by Tracy Ford. I may cover these papers next time in a follow-up post. Also, there is not much published on lizard lips that I could find using Google Scholar (and none that I had access to....scientific papers need to be open access!). Apparently, lips are not that interesting to most biologists and paleontologists. Oh well, I think it's an interesting topic, anyways!
Comments, as always, are welcomed!










